4.7 Article

Design and evaluation of an independent 4-week, exosuit-assisted, post-stroke community walking program

Journal

ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Volume 1525, Issue 1, Pages 147-159

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14998

Keywords

community; exosuit; gait; propulsion; rehabilitation; stroke; training

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic impairment in the paretic ankle following stroke often requires the use of compensatory patterns, such as asymmetric propulsion, for effective walking. Ankle exosuit assistance can provide biomechanical benefits, but practice in lab settings is limited. This study combines community training with exosuit assistance to improve gait training and rehabilitation.
Chronic impairment in the paretic ankle following stroke often requires that individuals use compensatory patterns such as asymmetric propulsion to achieve effective walking speeds needed for community engagement. Ankle exosuit assistance can provide ankle biomechanical benefit in the lab, but such environments inherently limit the amount of practice available. Community walking studies without exosuits can provide massed practice and benefit walking speed but are limited in their ability to assist proper mechanics. In this study, we combined the positive aspects of community training with those of exosuit assistance. We developed and evaluated a community Robotic Exosuit Augmented Locomotion (cREAL) program. Four participants in the chronic stage of stroke independently used our community ankle exosuit for walking in the community 3-5 days/week for 4 weeks. We performed lab evaluations before and after the 4-week program. Two participants significantly improved their unassisted paretic propulsion by an average of 27% after the program and walked on average 4001 steps/day more in the week following the program. Despite the small number of participants, this study provides preliminary evidence for the potential of exosuits to augment gait training and rehabilitation in the community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available