4.8 Article

Framework-Topology-Dependent Catalytic Activity of Zirconium-Based (Porphinato)zinc(II) MOFs

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 43, Pages 14449-14457

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b09113

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1334928]
  2. NSF MRSEC of the Materials Research Center of Northwestern University [DMR-1121262]
  3. NSF-NSEC and -MRSEC programs
  4. Keck Foundation
  5. State of Illinois
  6. Northwestern University
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1334928] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catalytic activity for acyl transfer from N-acetylimidazole (NAI) to different pyridylcarbinol (PC) regioisomers (2-PC, 3-PC, and 4-PC) is demonstrated for a set of topologically diverse, zirconium-based (porphinato)zinc metal organic frameworks (MOFs). The MOFs studied are PCN-222, MOF-525, and NU-902, which are based on the csq, ftw, and scu topologies, respectively. The experimentally obtained reaction kinetics are discussed in light of molecular modeling results. The catalytic activity is shown to vary across the series of MOFs due to the different extent to which each topology facilitates reactant preconcentration and alignment of PC and NAI via coordination to framework porphyrin sites (orientation effects). Trends of experimental initial reaction rates with MOF topology and PC regioisomer are consistent with preconcentration effects, which depend on the number of porphyrin sites per volume of MOF, as well as with orientation effects, which depend on the number of porphyrin pairs per volume of MOF that bind PC and NAI in such a way that they are primed to form the required transition state. The present work shows how the proper alignment of catalytic linkers can enhance reaction rates in MOFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available