4.8 Article

Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Axially Chiral Diaryl Ethers through Enantioselective Desymmetrization

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202300481

Keywords

Axial Chirality; Chiral Phosphoric Acid; Electrophilic Aromatic Amination; Enantioselective Desymmetrization; Organocatalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a highly efficient catalytic asymmetric synthesis of diaryl ether atropisomers was reported via an organocatalyzed enantioselective desymmetrization protocol. The chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed asymmetric electrophilic aromatic aminations of symmetrical substrates provided a series of diaryl ether atropisomers with excellent yields and enantioselectivities. The utilization of the 1,2-benzenediamine moiety in the products allowed for the facile construction of heterocycles, leading to a wide range of structurally diverse and novel azaarene-containing diaryl ether atropisomers.
Axially chiral diaryl ethers are a type of unique atropisomers bearing two potential axes, which have potential applications in a variety of research fields. However, the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of these diaryl ether atropisomers is largely underexplored when compared to the catalytic asymmetric synthesis of biaryl or other types of atropisomers. Herein, we report a highly efficient catalytic asymmetric synthesis of diaryl ether atropisomers through an organocatalyzed enantioselective desymmetrization protocol. The chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed asymmetric electrophilic aromatic aminations of the symmetrical 1,3-benzenediamine type substrates afforded a series of diaryl ether atropisomers in excellent yields and enantioselectivities. The facile construction of heterocycles by the utilizations of the 1,2-benzenediamine moiety in the products provided access to a variety of structurally diverse and novel azaarene-containing diaryl ether atropisomers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available