4.8 Article

Minimizing Temperature Bias through Reliable Temperature Determination in Gas-Solid Photothermal Catalytic Reactions

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 62, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202219340

Keywords

Experimental Protocol; Photothermal Catalysis; Temperature Detection; Temperature Differences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enormous advances have been made in photothermal catalysis, but temperature assessment remains controversial in most photothermal catalytic systems. We revealed the phenomenon of temperature determination bias in gas-solid photothermal catalytic systems, which has been overlooked in most cases. To avoid temperature bias interference, we developed a universal protocol for reliable temperature evaluation by optimizing the reaction system. This study presents a functional and credible practice for temperature detection and emphasizes the effects of temperature differences in gas-solid photothermal catalysis.
Enormous advances in photothermal catalysis have been made over the years, whereas the temperature assessment still remains controversial in the majority of photothermal catalytic systems. Herein, we methodically uncovered the phenomenon of temperature determination bias arising from prominent temperature differences in gas-solid photothermal catalytic systems, which extensively existed yet has been overlooked in most relevant cases. To avoid the interference of temperature bias, we developed a universal protocol for reliable temperature evaluation of gas-solid photothermal catalytic reactions, with emphasis on eliminating the temperature gradient and temperature fluctuation of catalyst layer via optimizing the reaction system. This work presents a functional and credible practice for temperature detection, calling attention to addressing the effects of temperature differences, and reassessing the actual temperature-based performances in gas-solid photothermal catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available