4.8 Article

Electrochemiluminescence Distance and Reactivity of Coreactants Determine the Sensitivity of Bead-Based Immunoassays

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202216525

Keywords

Electrochemiluminescence; Immunoassay; Radical Lifetime; Reaction Mechanism; Reactivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the electrochemiluminescence (ECL) generation by Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) and five tertiary amine coreactants was investigated. The ECL distance and reactivity of the coreactants were measured, and the integrated ECL intensity was used to quantitatively evaluate the reactivity. Statistical analysis of ECL images of labeled microbeads showed that the ECL distance and reactivity of the coreactant determine the emission intensity and sensitivity of immunoassay. BIS-TRIS was found to balance the trade-off between ECL distance and reactivity, resulting in a 236% increase in sensitivity compared to TPrA in the bead-based immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen.
Herein we report the study of electrochemiluminescence (ECL) generation by tris(2,2 '-bipyridyl)ruthenium (Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)) and five tertiary amine coreactants. The ECL distance and lifetime of coreactant radical cations were measured by ECL self-interference spectroscopy. And the reactivity of coreactants was quantitatively evaluated in terms of integrated ECL intensity. By statistical analysis of ECL images of single Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-labeled microbeads, we propose that ECL distance and reactivity of coreactant codetermine the emission intensity and thus the sensitivity of immunoassay. 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2 ',2 ''-nitrilotriethanol (BIS-TRIS) can well balance ECL distance-reactivity trade-off and enhance the sensitivity by 236 % compared with tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) in the bead-based immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen. The study brings an insightful understanding of ECL generation in bead-based immunoassay and a way of maximizing the analytical sensitivity from the aspect of coreactant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available