4.8 Article

All The Catalytic Active Sites of MoS2 for Hydrogen Evolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 51, Pages 16632-16638

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b05940

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CCDM, EFRC - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-SC0012575]
  2. DOE, Office of Science, BES, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-SC0012704]
  3. NSF/DOE [NSF PHY1338917]
  4. State of North Carolina
  5. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MoS2 presents a promising low-cost catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), but the understanding about its active sites has remained limited. Here we present an unambiguous study of the catalytic activities of all possible reaction sites of MoS2, including edge sites, sulfur vacancies, and grain boundaries. We demonstrate that, in addition to the well-known catalytically active edge sites, sulfur vacancies provide another major active site for the HER, while the catalytic activity of grain boundaries is much weaker. The intrinsic turnover frequencies (Tafel slopes) of the edge sites, sulfur vacancies, and grain boundaries are estimated to be 7.5 s(-1) (65-75 mV/dec), 3.2 s(-1) (65-85 mV/dec), and 0.1 s(-1) (120-160 mV/dec), respectively. We also demonstrate that the catalytic activity of sulfur vacancies strongly depends on the density of the vacancies and the local crystalline structure in proximity to the vacancies. Unlike edge sites, whose catalytic activity linearly depends on the length, sulfur vacancies show optimal catalytic activities when the vacancy density is in the range of 7-10%, and the number of sulfur vacancies in high crystalline quality MoS2 is higher than that in low crystalline quality MoS2, which may be related with the proximity of different local crystalline structures to the vacancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available