4.6 Article

The autophagy pathway maintained signaling crosstalk with the Keap1-Nrf2 system through p62 in auditory cells under oxidative stress

Journal

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 382-393

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.11.024

Keywords

Autophagy Auditory cell; Oxidative stress; p62; Keap1/Nrf2

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23592494]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592494] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main purposes of our study were to consider the effect of autophagy on auditory cells under oxidative stress, and the function of possible crosstalk among p62, Keap1 and Nrf2 in autophagy-deficient auditory cells. First we described how cell death was induced in auditory cell line (HEI-OC1) exposed to H2O2. We found that the decision for the cell death of auditory cells under oxidative stress depends on the balance between autophagy and necrosis due to ATP depletion, and autophagy plays a cytoprotective function in oxidative stress-induced necrosis. Our data clearly suggested that autophagy was a cell survival mechanism in H2O2-induced cell death, based on the observation that suppression of autophagy by knockdown of Atg7 sensitized, whereas activation of autophagy by rapamycin protected against H2O2-induced cell death. Next our results regarding the relationship among p62, Nr12 and Keapl by siRNA paradoxically showed that p62 creates a positive feedback loop in the Keapl/Nrf2 pathway. Autophagy impaired by Atg7 knockdown degrades Keapl in a p62-dependent manner, whereas Nrf2 is activated. As a result, the cell death induced by H2O2 was promoted in auditory cells. Taken together, these results suggested that the autophagy pathway maintained signaling crosstalk with the KeaplNrf2 system through p62 in auditory cells under oxidative stress. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available