4.8 Article

Translation Initiation is Controlled by RNA Folding Kinetics via a Ribosome Drafting Mechanism

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 22, Pages 7016-7023

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01453

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-14-1-0089]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0074]
  3. NSF [CBET-1253641]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1253641] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA folding plays an important role in controlling protein synthesis as well as other cellular processes. Existing models have focused on how RNA folding energetics control translation initiation: rate under equilibrium conditions but have largely ignored the effects of nonequilibrium RNA folding. We introduce a new mechanism, called ribosome drafting, that explains how a mRNA's folding kinetics and the ribosome's binding rate collectively control its translation initiation rate. During cycles of translation, ribosome drafting emerges;whenever successive ribosomes bind to a mRNA faster than the mRNA can refold, maintaining it in a nonequilibrium state with an acceleration of protein synthesis. Using computational design, time-correlated single photon counting, and expression measurements, we demonstrate that slow-folding and fast-folding RNA structures with equivalent folding energetics can vary protein synthesis rates by 1000-fold. We determine the necessary conditions for ribosome drafting by characterizing mRNAs with rationally designed ribosome binding rates, folding kinetics, and folding energetics, confirming the predictions of a nonequilibrium Markov model of translation. Our results have widespread implications, illustrating how competitive folding and assembly kinetics can shape the gene expression machinery's sequence structure function relationship inside cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available