4.3 Article

Oral appliance influence on jaw function in obstructive sleep apnea

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.04.018

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the changes in jaw function after using an oral appliance to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The results showed that the oral appliance had limited influence on jaw functions and related symptoms, and the risk of pain and functional impairment in the jaw was low.
Introduction: Oral appliance (OA) therapy in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could be a risk factor for normal jaw function, given the prolonged effect of an OA in keeping the mandible in a protruded position away from a normal position. This study aimed to assess changes in symptoms and clinical findings related to jaw function after 1 year of treating OSA with an OA. Methods: In this follow-up clinical trial, 302 patients with OSA were assigned to treatment with either monobloc or bibloc OA. Baseline and 1-year follow-up assessment included using the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale, self-reported symptoms and signs related to jaw function. The clinical examination of jaw function included mandibular mobility, dental occlusion, and tenderness in the temporomandibular joints and masticatory muscles. Descriptive analyses of variables are presented for the per-protocol population. To evaluate differences between the baseline and the 1-year follow-up, paired Student t tests and the McNemar change test was used. Results: One-hundred and ninety-two patients completed the 1-year follow-up (male 73%, mean aged 55 6 11 years). There was no change in the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale score at the follow-up (nonsignificant). The patients described no change in symptoms at the follow-up, except for improvements in morning headache (P \0.001) and increased frequency of difficulties in opening the mouth or chewing on awakening (P = 0.002). Subjectively reported changes in dental occlusion during biting/chewing increased significantly at the follow-up (P = 0.009). Conclusions: No changes in measurements of jaw mobility, dental occlusion, or pain on palpation of the tempo-romandibular joints or masticatory muscles were seen at the follow-up. Thus, using an OA in treating OSA had limited influence on jaw functions and related symptoms. Moreover, the risk of developing pain and functional impairment in the masticatory system was infrequent, indicating that this treatment is safe and can be recommended. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023;164:682-9)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available