4.5 Review

Efficacy of Epidural Blood Patching or Surgery in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 730-739

Publisher

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7880

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study synthesized evidence on the efficacy of treatments for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), identified evidence gaps, and prioritized future research.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is an important cause of treatable secondary headaches. Evidence on the efficacy of epidural blood patching and surgery for spontaneous intracranial hypotension has not been synthesized.PURPOSE: Our aim was to identify evidence clusters and knowledge gaps in the efficacy of treatments for spontaneous intracranial hypotension to prioritize future research.DATA SOURCES: We searched published English language articles on MEDLINE (Ovid), the Web of Science (Clarivate), and EMBASE (Elsevier) from inception until October 29, 2021.STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed experimental, observational, and systematic review studies assessing the efficacy of epidural blood patching or surgery in spontaneous intracranial hypotension.DATA ANALYSIS: One author performed data extraction, and a second verified it. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or adjudicated by a third author.DATA SYNTHESIS: One hundred thirty-nine studies were included (median, 14 participants; range, 3?298 participants). Most articles were published in the past decade. Most assessed epidural blood patching outcomes. No studies met level 1 evidence. Most were retrospective cohort or case series (92.1%, n = 128). A few compared the efficacy of different treatments (10.8%, n = 15). Most used objective methods for the diagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (62.3%, n = 86); however, 37.7% (n = 52) did not clearly meet the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 criteria. CSF leak type was unclear in 77.7% (n = 108). Nearly all reported patient symptoms using unvalidated measures (84.9%, n = 118). Outcomes were rarely collected at uniform prespecified time points.LIMITATIONS:The investigation did not include transvenous embolization of CSF-to-venous fistulas.CONCLUSIONS: Evidence gaps demonstrate a need for prospective study designs, clinical trials, and comparative studies. We recommend using the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 diagnostic criteria, explicit reporting of CSF leak subtype, inclusion of key procedural details, and using objective validated outcome measures collected at uniform time points.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available