4.6 Article

Gender Equality in National Cardiology Societies A Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages 585-591

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.02.012

Keywords

Cardiology; Diversity; Equality; ESC; Gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed gender equality in national cardiology societies affiliated with the European Society of Cardiology, as well as the American Heart Association. The findings revealed a significant gender gap in leadership positions, with men outnumbering women in all world regions.
BACKGROUND: Higher productivity and team stability have been shown for gender-diverse teams. However, there is a relevant and well-known gender gap in clinical and academic cardiovascular medicine. So far, no data concerning gender distribution in presidents and executive boards of national cardiology societies exist. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, gender equality in presidents and representatives of all national cardiology societies, which were members of, or affiliated with, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2022, was analyzed. In addition, representatives of the American Heart Association (AHA) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 106 national societies were screened, of which 104 were included in the final analysis. Overall, 90 of 106 (85%) presidents were men, while 14 (13%) were women. In the analysis of board members and executives, a total of 1128 individuals were included. Overall, 809 (72%) board members were men, 258 (23%) women, and 61 (5%) of unknown gender. Except for society presidents in Australia, women were relevantly outnumbered by men in all world regions. CONCLUSION: Women were underrepresented in leading positions of national cardiology societies in all world regions. As national societies are important regional stakeholders, improving gender equality in executive boards might create women role models, help foster careers, and narrow the global cardiology (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. center dot The American Journal of Medicine (2023) 136:585-591

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available