4.2 Article

Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 191, Issue 5, Pages 1164-1209

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63132

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of genetic skeletal disorders has been revised in its 11th edition, now including 771 entries associated with 552 genes, reflecting advancements in DNA sequencing technology. The adoption of the dyadic naming system is the most notable change, systematically linking a phenotypic entity to the gene it originates from. This shift is considered a significant improvement, providing more informative and error-resistant nomenclature compared to traditional methods. Despite the adoption of dyadic naming, efforts have been made to maintain a strong connection to the MIM catalog and its historical data. The list of disorders and genes in the Nosology remains valuable for differential diagnosis, bioinformatic analysis, and driving advancements in biology and medicine.
The Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders has undergone its 11th revision and now contains 771 entries associated with 552 genes reflecting advances in molecular delineation of new disorders thanks to advances in DNA sequencing technology. The most significant change as compared to previous versions is the adoption of the dyadic naming system, systematically associating a phenotypic entity with the gene it arises from. We consider this a significant step forward as dyadic naming is more informative and less prone to errors than the traditional use of list numberings and eponyms. Despite the adoption of dyadic naming, efforts have been made to maintain strong ties to the MIM catalog and its historical data. As with the previous versions, the list of disorders and genes in the Nosology may be useful in considering the differential diagnosis in the clinic, directing bioinformatic analysis of next-generation sequencing results, and providing a basis for novel advances in biology and medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available