4.3 Article

Management and Follow-up of Massive Fetomaternal Hemorrhage Requiring High-Dose Rh Immune Globulin

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages 78-80

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad011

Keywords

Transfusion medicine; Immunology; Fetomaternal hemorrhage; Rh(D)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports a case of massive fetomaternal hemorrhage and the successful prevention of Rh(D) alloimmunization using IV RhIG, resulting in a subsequent healthy pregnancy.
Objectives Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is rare and reported to be the cause in approximately 3% of all fetal deaths. Maternal management of massive FMH includes prevention of Rh(D) alloimmunization in Rh(D)-negative mothers by administration of Rh(D) immune globulin (RhIG). Methods We describe a case of a 30-year-old O-negative, primigravida woman who presented at 38 weeks of gestation with decreased fetal movements. She underwent an emergency cesarean section and delivered an O-positive baby girl who died shortly after birth. Results The patient's FMH screen was positive, with a Kleihauer-Betke test demonstrating 10.7% fetal blood in maternal circulation. The calculated dose of 6,300 mu g RhIG was given prior to discharge over 2 days using an intravenous (IV) preparation. Antibody screening a week after discharge showed anti-D and anti-C. The anti-C was attributed to acquired passive immunity from the large dose of RhIG. Anti-C reactivity waned and was negative at 6 months, but the anti-D pattern persisted at 9 months postdelivery. Negative antibody screens were noted at 12 and 14 months. Conclusions This case highlights the immunohematology challenges of IV RhIG as well as the success in preventing alloimmunization with IV RhIG given the patient's complete resolution of anti-C and no anti-D formation, with a subsequent healthy pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available