4.5 Article

Anatomical functional traits and hydraulic vulnerability of trees in different water conditions in southern Amazonia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16146

Keywords

Brazilian Cerrado; cavitation; functional traits; leaf blade; tropical rainforest; water deficit

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the dominant tree species in southern Amazonia have different responses to drought, indicating the potential for shift in floristic and functional composition under climate change.
PremiseUnderstanding tree species' responses to drought is critical for predicting the future of tropical forests, especially in regions where the climate is changing rapidly. MethodsWe compared anatomical and functional traits of the dominant tree species of two tropical forests in southern Amazonia, one on deep, well-drained soils (cerradao [CD]) and one in a riparian environment (gallery forest [GF]), to examine potential anatomical indicators of resistance or vulnerability to drought. ResultsLeaves of CD species generally had a thicker cuticle, upper epidermis, and mesophyll than those of GF species, traits that are indicative of adaptation to water deficit. In the GF, the theoretical hydraulic conductivity of the stems was significantly higher, indicating lower investment in drought resistance. The anatomical functional traits of CD species indicate a greater potential for surviving water restriction compared to the GF. Even so, it is possible that CD species could also be affected by extreme climate changes due to the more water-limited environment. ConclusionsIn addition to the marked anatomical and functional differences between these phytophysiognomies, tree diversity within each is associated with a large range of hydraulic morphofunctional niches. Our results suggest the strong potential for floristic and functional compositional shifts under continued climate change, especially in the GF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available