4.8 Article

Small Molecule-Based Pattern Recognition To Classify RNA Structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages 409-416

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b11087

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Duke University
  2. U.S. National Institute of Health [P50GM103297]
  3. U.S. Department of Education GAANN Fellowship [P200A150114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional RNA structures are notoriously difficult to determine, and the link between secondary structure and RNA conformation is only beginning to be understood. These challenges have hindered the identification of guiding principles for small molecule:RNA recognition. We herein demonstrate that the strong and differential binding ability of aminoglycosides to RNA structures can be used to classify five canonical RNA secondary structure motifs through principal component analysis (PCA). In these analyses, the aminoglycosides act as receptors, while RNA structures labeled with a benzofuranyluridine fluorophore act as analytes. Complete (100%) predictive ability for this RNA training set was achieved by incorporating two exhaustively guanidinylated aminoglycosides into the receptor library. The PCA was then externally validated using biologically relevant RNA constructs. In bulge-stem-loop constructs of HIV-1 transactivation response element (TAR) RNA, we achieved nucleotide-specific classification of two independent secondary structure motifs. Furthermore, examination of cheminformatic parameters and PCA loading factors revealed trends in aminoglycoside:RNA recognition, including the importance of shape-based discrimination, and suggested the potential for size and sequence discrimination within RNA structural motifs. These studies present a new approach to classifying RNA structure and provide direct evidence that RNA topology, in addition to sequence, is critical for the molecular recognition of RNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available