4.6 Article

Contamination of tea leaves by anthraquinone: The atmosphere as a possible source

Journal

AMBIO
Volume 52, Issue 8, Pages 1373-1388

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01858-9

Keywords

Air pollution; Anthraquinone; Atmospheric transport; Food contamination; Pesticide residue limits; Tea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection of anthraquinone in tea leaves has raised concerns and the European Union imposed a maximum residue limit for this substance. This study investigates the contamination resulting from atmospheric deposition of anthraquinone using a global chemical transport model. The simulations suggest that atmospheric deposition could be a substantial source of anthraquinone found on tea leaves in certain tea-producing regions.
The detection of anthraquinone in tea leaves has raised concerns due to a potential health risk associated with this species. This led the European Union to impose a maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.02 mg/kg for anthraquinone in dried tea leaves. As atmospheric contamination has been identified as one of the possible sources of anthraquinone residue, this study investigates the contamination resulting from the deposition of atmospheric anthraquinone using a global chemical transport model that accounts for the emission, atmospheric transport, chemical transformation, and deposition of anthraquinone on the surface. The largest contribution to the global atmospheric budget of anthraquinone is from residential combustion followed by the secondary formation from oxidation of anthracene. Simulations suggest that atmospheric anthraquinone deposition could be a substantial source of the anthraquinone found on tea leaves in several tea-producing regions, especially near highly industrialized and populated areas of southern and eastern Asia. The high level of anthraquinone deposition in these areas may result in residues in tea products exceeding the EU MRL. Additional contamination could also result from local tea production operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available