4.7 Article

Approaches to assessing the daily average ground surface soil heat flux on a regional scale over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 336, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109494

Keywords

Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; Daily average ground surface soil heat flux; Remote sensing-based model; Combination method; Sine method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes two methods, the combination method (CM) and the sine method (SM), for estimating the daily average ground surface soil heat flux (G0_daily) over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). The CM estimates the instantaneous surface soil heat flux (G0_ins) at multiple times per day and then calculates G0_daily. The SM simulates G0_daily by estimating G0_ins during satellite transit based on diurnal variations in sinusoidal curves under clear-sky conditions. The CM shows better performance than the SM in terms of accuracy and applicability.
The daily average ground surface soil heat flux (G0_daily) has been widely applied in land surface models. The accuracy of modeling G0_daily greatly impacts the estimation of the evapotranspiration and heat and moisture exchanges between the atmosphere and ground surface in frozen ground regions. We propose two methods for estimating G0_daily over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP): the combination method (CM) and the sine method (SM). The instantaneous surface soil heat flux (G0_ins) is estimated at multiple times per day using the CM, and then, G0_daily is obtained. The SM simulates G0_daily by estimating G0_ins during the satellite transit based on the diurnal variation in the sinusoidal curves of G0_ins under clear-sky conditions. For G0_ins, the root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) of the CM are more than 10 W/m2 lower and 0.12 higher than those of the surface energy balance system (SEBS), respectively. For G0_daily, at the four sites (TGLMS, Naqu, Biru, and Nierong), the RMSE and the correlation coefficient (R) values of the CM are better than those of the SM by -0.86 W/m2, 9.04 W/m2, 4.33 W/m2, and 2.55 W/m2 and 0.19, 0.12, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively. The CM is applicable under all weather conditions and multi-period and multi-parameter observations throughout a day. Due to the principle of the SM, it can only simulate G0_daily when the satellite observes at least once each in the daytime and nighttime under clear-sky conditions. The SM overcomes the shortcomings of the CM, i.e., the requirements of complex input parameters and a large data volume. The advantage of the high spatial resolution of polar-orbiting satellite remotely sensed data (such as Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data) is given full play by the SM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available