4.6 Article

Monitoring and analysis of Woda landslide (China) using InSAR and Sentinel-1 data

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 1789-1802

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.055

Keywords

Landslide; SBAS-InSAR; Deformation analysis; GNSS; Hydrological data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses satellite remote sensing technology to monitor the movement of the Woda landslide in Yunnan in recent years and finds that the deformation of the landslide is closely related to precipitation.
Detecting the slow motions of highly elevated landslides in remote mountain areas has always been a problem. This paper takes the Woda landslide along the Jinsha River as an example to monitor landslide movement. Although some parts of the landslide body have been found to have moved in recent years, the timing and magnitude of motion have not been systematically monitored or interpreted. Here, we apply the SBAS time series strategy using 65-scene Sentinel-1A/B satellite InSAR images and study the spatial distribution and temporal behaviour of landslide movements between July 4, 2018, and August 29, 2020. Our research results show that the cumulative deformation on the left side of the landslide body with concentrated deformation was approximately 200 mm during the 2-year observation period. By calculating the relationship between the InSAR time series and the precipitation around the landslide, it is found that the landslide deformation is closely related to precipitation. GNSS technology is also deployed on the landslide mass and effectively complements InSAR technology. Simultaneously, based on the results of field surveys and hydrological data analysing the landslide's spatial deformation characteristics and deformation factors, the landslide deformation can also be inferred to be related to precipitation. & COPY; 2023 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available