Journal
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-023-10238-7
Keywords
OSCEs; Assessment; Medical education; Institutional ethnography
Ask authors/readers for more resources
New public management ideals and standards are increasingly followed in health professions education, particularly in high-stakes assessment for practice. This study used an Institutional Ethnographic approach to examine the work involved in running high-stakes Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs). The results reveal three types of work - standardising work, defensibility work, and accountability work - and highlight the shift towards accountability-centred practices.
New public management ideals and standards have become increasingly adhered to in health professions education; this is particularly apparent in high-stakes assessment, as a gateway to practice. Using an Institutional Ethnographic approach, we looked at the work involved in running high-stakes Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) throughout an academic year including use of observations, interviews and textual analysis. In our results, we describe three types of 'work'-standardising work, defensibility work and accountability work-summarising these in the discussion as an Accountability Circuit, which shows the organising role of texts on people's work processes. We show how this form of governance mandates a shift towards accountability-centred practices, away from practices which are person-centred; this lens on accountability-centring during high-stakes assessments invites critique of the often-unquestioned emphasis of new public management in health professions education.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available