4.8 Review

Artificial Cilia-Bridging the Gap with Nature

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202300856

Keywords

active surfaces; artificial cilia; biomimetics; low reynolds fluid propulsion; soft actuators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human ingenuity has developed various methods to manipulate fluids in different applications, but the principles of fluid propulsion change at the microscale. Nature has found a solution in cilia, microscopic active organelles that propel fluids at small dimensions. Mimicking biological cilia remains challenging due to their small size and complexity. This study analyzes artificial cilia technology and compares it to natural cilia to identify the remaining design and manufacturing challenges causing the disparity.
Human ingenuity has found a multitude of ways to manipulate fluids across different applications. However, the fundamentals of fluid propulsion change when moving from the macro- to the microscale. Viscous forces dominate inertial forces rendering successful methods at the macroscale ineffective for microscale fluid propulsion. Nature however has found a solution; microscopic active organelles protruding from cells that feature intricate beating patterns: cilia. Cilia succeed in propelling fluids at small dimensions; hence they have served as a source of inspiration for microfluidic applications. Mimicking biological cilia however remains challenging due to their small size and the required kinematic complexity. Recent advances have pushed artificial cilia technology forward, yet discrepancies with natural cilia still exists. This study identifies this gap by analyzing artificial cilia technology and benchmarking them to natural cilia, to pinpoint the remaining design and manufacturing challenges that lay at the basis of the disparity with nature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available