Journal
ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2023.2178272
Keywords
repeated low-velocity impacts; damage accumulation; interlaminar and intralaminar failure; GFRP laminate; numerical simulation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper investigates the repeated low-velocity impact response of woven S2-glass/epoxy composites. Impact tests were conducted using a drop-tower apparatus with energies ranging from 18.4 to 59.2 J. Post-mortem analysis was performed after each impact to evaluate the impact response. A damage index was used to quantify the changes in impact response due to repeated impacts. Finite element simulations considering both interlaminar and intralaminar failure modes were carried out. The results reveal a decrease in impact force and bending stiffness with the number of impacts, while impact duration and maximum central displacement increased. The shape of the damaged area was also found to be affected. The numerical results indicate that interlaminar damage primarily initiated at the interfaces during the first impact and propagated in-plane in subsequent impacts. Intralaminar damage initiated at the backside of the laminate and then propagated in-plane and through-thickness until penetration occurred.
In this paper, the repeated low-velocity impact response of woven S2-glass/epoxy composites is studied. The impacts were performed with energies from 18.4 to 59.2 J using a drop-tower apparatus, and a post-mortem analysis after each impact was employed to assess the impact response. A damage index was used to describe the changes in impact response due to repeated impacts. Finite element simulations considering both interlaminar and intralaminar failure modes were performed. The results showed that the impact force and bending stiffness decreased with the number of impacts, while impact duration and maximum central displacement increased. The shape of the damaged area was also affected. The numerical results showed that interlaminar damage initiated at most interfaces during the first impact, followed by in-plane propagation in the next impacts. Also, intralaminar damage initiated at the backside of the laminate, and then in-plane and through-thickness propagations followed until penetration occurred.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available