4.8 Article

A Titanium-Organic Framework as an Exemplar of Combining the Chemistry of Metal- and Covalent-Organic Frameworks

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 13, Pages 4330-4333

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01233

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany) [MOF-901]
  2. VNU-HCM [A2015-50-01-HD-KHCN, MANAR-CS-2015-04]
  3. U.S. Office of Naval Research Global: Naval International Cooperative Opportunities in Science and Technology [N62909-15-1N056]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MAT2013-45460-R]
  5. Fundacion General CSIC (Programa ComFuturo)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A crystalline material with a two-dimensional structure, termed metal organic framework-901 (MOF-901), was prepared using a strategy that combines the chemistry of MOFs and covalent organic frameworks (COFs). This strategy involves in situ generation of an amine-functionalized titanium oxo cluster, Ti6O6(OCH3)(6)(AB)(6) (AB = 4-aminobenzoate), which was linked with benzene-1,4-dialdehyde using imine condensation reactions, typical of COFs. The crystal structure of MOF-901 is composed of hexagonal porous layers that are likely stacked in staggered conformation (I-Lid topology). This MOF represents the first example of combining metal cluster chemistry with dynamic organic covalent bond formation to give a new crystalline, extended framework of titanium metal, which is rarely used in MOFs. The incorporation of Ti(IV) units made MOF-901 useful in the photocatalyzed polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA). The resulting polyMMA product was obtained with a high-number-average molar mass (26 850 g mol(-1) and low polydispersity index (1.6), which in many respects are better than those achieved by the commercially available photocatalyst (P-25 TiO2). Additionally, the catalyst can be isolated, reused, and recycled with no loss in performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available