4.8 Article

Size-Dependent Electrophoretic Deposition of Catalytic Gold Nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 138, Issue 47, Pages 15295-15298

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b09172

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1308763, CHE-1611170]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1308763] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we describe size-dependent electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of citrate-stabilized Au nano particles (NPs) onto indium-tin-oxide-coated glass (glass/ITO) electrodes as studied by linear sweep stripping voltammetry (LSSV) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). LSSV allows both the determination of the Au NP coverage and NP size from the peak area and the peak potential, respectively. Two-electrode EPD in aqueous solutions of Au NPs plus H2O2 reveal that a minimum potential of 1.5 V is needed for significant deposition of 4 nm diameter Au NPs as opposed to 2.0 V for 33 nm diameter Au NPs. EPD at 0.4 V in a solution of Au NPs prepared with a short 5 min reaction time led to the successful capture of 1-2 nm diameter Au NPs with appreciable coverage. In all cases, deposition did not occur in the absence of H2O2. Three-electrode experiments with a real reference electrode revealed the same size selective deposition with potential and that the amount of Au deposited depends on the deposition time and H2O2 concentration. The deposition occurs indirectly by oxidation of H2O2, which liberates protons and neutralizes the citrate stabilizer, leading to precipitation of the Au NPs onto the glass/ITO electrode. Studies on pH stability show that larger Au NPs aggregate at lower pH compared to smaller Au NPs. More importantly, though, 4 nm diameter Au NPs are much more catalytic for H2O2 oxidation, which is the main reason for the size selective deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available