4.8 Article

Correlating Charge Transfer Dynamics with Interfacial Trap States in High-Efficiency Organic Solar Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c21470

Keywords

organic solar cells; interfacial trap states; potential barrier; charge transfer rates; thermal activation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A general correlation between trap densities and charge transfer dynamics is established in high-efficiency organic photovoltaic blends. The electron transfer rates decrease with increased trap densities, while the hole transfer rates are independent of trap states. The local charges captured by traps induce potential barrier formation, suppressing electron transfer.
The charge transfer between the donor and acceptor determines the photogenerated carrier density in organic solar cells. However, a fundamental understanding regarding the charge transfer at donor/acceptor interfaces with high-density traps has not been fully addressed. Herein, a general correlation between trap densities and charge transfer dynamics is established by adopting a series of high-efficiency organic photovoltaic blends. It is found that the electron transfer rates are reduced with increased trap densities, while the hole transfer rates are independent of trap states. The local charges captured by traps can induce potential barrier formation around recombination centers, leading to the suppression of electron transfer. For the hole transfer process, the thermal energy provides a sufficient driving force, which ensures an efficient transfer rate. As a result, a 17.18% efficiency is obtained for PM6:BTP-eC9-based devices with the lowest interfacial trap densities. This work highlights the importance of interfacial traps in charge transfer processes and proposes an underlying insight into the charge transfer mechanism at nonideal interfaces in organic heterostructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available