4.8 Article

Scaling Law for Impact Resistance of Amorphous Alloys Connecting Atomistic Molecular Dynamics with Macroscale Experiments

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 13449-13459

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19719

Keywords

scaling law; amorphous alloy; micro-ballistic impact; dimensional analysis; molecular dynamics simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we establish the scaling law of impact resistance for amorphous alloys using laser-induced supersonic micro ballistic impact experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. The law connects the time and length scales of experimental results and simulations, providing a method for comparing the dynamic behavior of amorphous alloys at various scales and a guideline for designing new amorphous alloy materials with extraordinary impact resistance.
Establishing scaling laws for amorphous alloys is of critical importance for describing their mechanical behavior at different size scales. In this paper, taking Ni2Ta amorphous metallic alloy as a prototype materials system, we derive the scaling law of impact resistance for amorphous alloys. We use laser-induced supersonic micro ballistic impact experiments to measure for the first time the size-dependent impact response of amorphous alloys. We also report the results of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for the same system but at much smaller scales. Comparing these results, we determined a law for scaling both length and time scales based on dimensional analysis. It connects the time and length scales of the experimental results on the impact resistance of amorphous alloys to that of the MD simulations, providing a method for bridging the gap in comparing the dynamic behavior of amorphous alloys at various scales and a guideline for the fabrication of new amorphous alloy materials with extraordinary impact resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available