4.8 Article

Systematic Comparison of Commercial Hydrogels Revealed That a Synergy of Laminin and Strain-Stiffening Promotes Directed Migration of Neural Cells

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 12678-12695

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c20040

Keywords

peripheral nerve regeneration; tissue engineering; biomaterials; directionality; mechanobiology; stiffness; Schwann cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared various commercially available hydrogels and examined their effects on the morphology, viability, proliferation, and migration of nerve cells. The rheological properties and topography of the hydrogels were also analyzed. The results showed significant differences in cell elongation and directed migration on the hydrogels, which were driven by laminin and a porous, fibrous, and strain-stiffening matrix structure. This study enhances our understanding of cell-matrix interactions and provides technical support for the future fabrication of tailored hydrogels.
Hydrogels have shown potential in replacing damaged nerve tissue, but the ideal hydrogel is yet to be found. In this study, various commercially available hydrogels were compared. Schwann cells, fibroblasts, and dorsal root ganglia neurons were seeded on the hydrogels, and their morphology, viability, proliferation, and migration were examined. Additionally, detailed analyses of the gels' rheological properties and topography were conducted. Our results demonstrate vast differences on cell elongation and directed migration on the hydrogels. Laminin was identified as the driver behind cell elongation and in combination with a porous, fibrous, and strain-stiffening matrix structure responsible for oriented cell motility. This study improves our understanding of cell-matrix interactions and thereby facilitates tailored fabrication of hydrogels in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available