4.6 Article

Rituximab combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone for the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 835-840

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.020

Keywords

autoimmune blistering disease; cicatricial pemphigoid; immunosuppression; mucous membrane pemphigoid; ocular pemphigoid; rituximab

Categories

Funding

  1. Dermatology Foundation's Medical Dermatology Career Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The use of rituximab for refractory autoimmune blistering diseases is increasing. Data related to rituximab for the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) are limited. Objective: We sought to compare the efficacy of adding rituximab with traditional immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of MMP. The primary outcome was achievement and time to disease control. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of MMP from August 2001 to June 2015 who had greater than 6 months of follow-up after the initiation of therapy were reviewed. Results: In all, 24 patients were treated with rituximab and 25 were treated with conventional immunosuppression. Of patients, 100% in the rituximab group achieved disease control compared with 40% in the conventional group (P < .01), with a mean time to disease control of 10.17 months and 37.7 months (P =.02). Adverse events were seen in 33% of patients after rituximab, compared with 48% of patients in the conventional group (P =.2). Limitations: Rituximab dosing was not uniform and the 2 groups were not matched in terms of disease severity, nor were they randomized. Conclusions: Our study indicates that the addition of rituximab to conventional therapy in patients with MMP results in more rapid and sustained disease control with potentially fewer adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available