4.6 Article

Treatment of recalcitrant bullous pemphigoid (BP) with a novel protocol: A retrospective study with a 6-year follow-up

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 700-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.030

Keywords

bullous pemphigoid; clinical response; combination therapy; conventional therapy; death; infection; intravenous immunoglobulin; recalcitrant; remission; rituximab

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering skin disease that predominantly affects the elderly. Conventional therapy using highdose systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents can be ineffective in some patients and produce adverse events and relapses. Hence, alternate therapies are required. Objective: The clinical outcomes of patients with extensive, recalcitrant bullous pemphigoid treated with a combination therapy of rituximab (RTX) and intravenous immunoglobulin were evaluated. Methods: In this retrospective study, 12 patients (mean age of 68.25 years) unresponsive to previous conventional immunosuppressive therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or RTX were treated with this combination therapy. Results: Complete clinical resolution occurred in a mean of 4.6 months and previous systemic therapy was discontinued in 6.2 months. Two patients had a recurrence posttherapy and responded to additional RTX infusions. The remaining 10 patients had no recurrences. Patients were followed up for a mean of 73.8 months after discontinuation of all systemic therapy. All have remained in remission without adverse events for 6 years. Limitations: This was a retrospective study with a small sample size. Conclusion: The combination of RTX and intravenous immunoglobulin produced a sustained clinical remission without adverse events, infections, and hospitalizations. This specific combination protocol offers a promising therapy for patients with recalcitrant bullous pemphigoid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available