4.5 Article

Effects of fluid medium flow and spatial temperature variation on acoustophoretic motion of microparticles in microfluidic channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages 332-349

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.4939737

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of USA [ECCS-1232251]
  2. U.S. Army Corp of Engineering (Engineering Research and Development Center) [W9132T-12-2-0022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A numerical modeling method for accurately predicting the acoustophoretic motion of compressible microparticles in microfluidic devices is presented to consider the effects of fluid medium flow and spatial temperature variation that can significantly influence the acoustophoretic motion. In the proposed method, zeroth-order fluid medium flow and temperature, and first-and second-order acoustic fields in the microfluidic devices are first calculated by applying quadratic mapping functions and a second-order finite difference method (FDM) to perturbed mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations and state equation. Then, the acoustic radiation force is obtained based on the Gorkov's acoustic radiation force equation and applied to the Newton's Equation of Motion to calculate the microparticle motion. The proposed method was validated by comparing its results to a commercial software package, COMSOL Multiphysics results, one-dimensional, analytical modeling results, and experimental results. It is shown that the fluid medium flow affects the acoustic radiation force and streaming significantly, resulting in the acoustic radiation force and streaming prediction errors of 10.9% and 67.4%, respectively, when the fluid medium flow speed is increased from 0 to 1m/s. A local temperature elevation from 20 degrees C to 22 degrees C also results in the prediction errors of 88.4% and 73.4%. (C) 2016 Acoustical Society of America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available