4.1 Review

Nanotechnology in Residential Building Materials for Better Fire Protection and Life Safety Outcomes

Journal

FIRE-SWITZERLAND
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fire5060174

Keywords

nanotechnology; fire-resistant; construction; building materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Residential fires are the main cause of fire deaths and injuries globally, creating a demand for better fire-resistant building materials. Nanotechnology shows potential, but faces challenges in terms of economy, sustainability, and safety. This research critically examines the use of nanotechnology in residential construction materials from a safety perspective, aiming to fortify buildings and prevent fire-related injuries and deaths. The paper reviews different types of nanomaterials, discusses their known toxicity, and evaluates their ability to meet requirements for sustainability, economy, and safety.
Residential fires are the main source of fire deaths and injuries both in the United States and globally. As such, better fire-resistant building materials are needed to bolster fire protection and to enhance life safety. This is during a time when fewer materials are being used to construct homes. Nanotechnology may be a solution if it can overcome its current barriers to widespread adoption in residential construction, namely economy, sustainability, and safety. This research effort includes a critical examination of the literature from a safety perspective to address fire deaths and prevent personal injuries and illnesses by targeting fortification of residential construction building materials via the use of nanotechnology. The paper reviews nanotechnology for building materials by material type, known toxicity of various nanomaterials used in construction, and a discussion on a way forward through assessing materials by their ability to satisfy the requirements of sustainability, economy, and safety- both as a material designed to reduce fire injury and death and from a toxicological hazard perspective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available