4.0 Article

Beyond fear and abandonment: Public transport resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100711

Keywords

Public transport; COVID-19; Resilience; Sustainable mobility; Transport policies

Categories

Funding

  1. Joint Research Programme HERA
  2. AKA
  3. BMBF via DLR-PT
  4. European Commission through Horizon 2020 [649307]
  5. ETAg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed both the users of public transport and their experiences of journeys, challenging the narrative that portrays public transport as a place of fear. Promoting resilient public transport requires policies that address the needs of passengers relying on public transport services.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic challenged urban public transport systems to maintain accessibility and service for daily users while adapting to local health and safety regulations. Developing sustainable and resilient urban policies under such crisis conditions requires understanding the different feelings, experiences and expectations of passengers and how these relate to socio-economic inequalities. Drawing on a mixed-method study in Berlin (Germany), Brussels (Belgium), Stockholm (Sweden) and Tallinn (Estonia), we show how the pandemic outbreak has changed both who uses public transport and how users experience their journeys. Challenging the narratives that portray public transport as a place of fear, we find that remaining passengers assess the risk of contagion lower than those who avoided it completely. We argue that promoting resilient public transport requires policies that address the needs of passengers relying on public transport services. Therefore, we question the current policies under the sustainable mobility paradigm for not taking sufficient account of the feelings, experiences and emotions and particularly of transport-dependent users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available