4.6 Review

Abortion decision-making process trajectories and determinants in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ECLINICALMEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101694

Keywords

Abortion; Pregnancy termination; Decision-making; Abortion trajectories; Low- and middle-income countries; Mixed-methods; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Nuffield Department of Population Health DPhil Scholarship
  2. University of Oxford
  3. Medical Research Council Career Development Award [MR/P022030/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to examine the trajectories and determinants of induced abortion decision-making among women in low- and middle-income countries. The findings suggest that women's abortion decisions are influenced by factors such as autonomy, access to information, and the involvement of their male partners.
Background About 45.1% of all induced abortions are unsafe and 97% of these occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women's abortion decisions may be complex and are influenced by various factors. We aimed to delineate women's abortion decision-making trajectories and their determinants in LMICs. Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Global Health, Web of Science, Scopus, IBSS, CINAHL, WHO Global Index Medicus, the Cochrane Library, WHO website, ProQuest, and Google Scholar for primary studies and reports published between January 1, 2000, and February 16, 2021 (updated on June 06, 2022), on induced abortion decision-making trajectories and/or their determinants in LMICs. We excluded studies on spontaneous abortion. Two independent reviewers extracted and assessed quality of each paper. We used best fit framework synthesis to synthesise abortion decision-making trajectories and thematic synthesis to synthesise their determinants. We analysed quantitative findings using random effects model. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO number CRD42021224719. Findings Of the 6960 articles identified, we included 79 in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. We identified nine abortion decision-making trajectories: pregnancy awareness, self-reflection, initial abortion decision, disclosure and seeking support, negotiations, final decision, access and information, abortion procedure, and post-abortion experience and care. Determinants of trajectories included three major themes of autonomy in decision-making, access and choice. A meta-analysis of data from 7737 women showed that the proportion of the overall women's involvement in abortion decision-making was 0.86 (95% CI:0.73-0.95, I-2 = 99.5%) and overall partner involvement was 0.48 (95% CI:0.29-0.68, I-2 = 99.6%). Interpretation Policies and strategies should address women's perceptions of safe abortion socially, legally, and economically, and where appropriate, involvement of male partners in abortion decision-making processes to facilitate safe abortion. Clinical heterogeneity, in which various studies defined the final decision-maker differentially, was a limitation of our study. Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available