4.3 Article

Functional Blockage of S100A8/A9 Ameliorates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Lung

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9110673

Keywords

ischemia reperfusion injury; A9; lung transplantation; damage-associated molecule patterns

Funding

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [20K09164, 20KK0203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified neutrophil-derived S100A8/A9 as a key factor in lung IR injury and identified it as a novel therapeutic target for lung IR injury. The use of anti-S100A8/A9 antibodies significantly improved IR injury.
(1) Background: Lung ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury increases the mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing lung transplantation. The objective of this study was to identify the key initiator of lung IR injury and to evaluate pharmacological therapeutic approaches using a functional inhibitor against the identified molecule. (2) Methods: Using a mouse hilar clamp model, the combination of RNA sequencing and histological investigations revealed that neutrophil-derived S100A8/A9 plays a central role in inflammatory reactions during lung IR injury. Mice were assigned to sham and IR groups with or without the injection of anti-S100A8/A9 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb). (3) Results: Anti-S100A8/A9 mAb treatment significantly attenuated plasma S100A8/A9 levels compared with control IgG. As evaluated by oxygenation capacity and neutrophil infiltration, the antibody treatment dramatically ameliorated the IR injury. The gene expression levels of cytokines and chemokines induced by IR injury were significantly reduced by the neutralizing antibody. Furthermore, the antibody treatment significantly reduced TUNEL-positive cells, indicating the presence of apoptotic cells. (4) Conclusions: We identified S100A8/A9 as a novel therapeutic target against lung IR injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available