4.3 Article

Meta-Analysis: A Convenient Tool for the Choice of Nose-to-Brain Nanocarriers

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9110647

Keywords

nasal; nanocarriers; polymeric; lipid; systematic; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intranasal route is a highly promising route for drug delivery to the brain, but also one of the most difficult and complex. Scientists are continuously searching for new drug delivery vehicles, and in this study, the superiority of nanocarriers, with lipid nanoparticles in particular, was confirmed.
Objectives: The intranasal route represents a high promising route of administration aiming for brain delivery. Yet, it represents one of the most difficult and complicated routes. Accordingly, scientists are in a continuous search for novel drug delivery vehicles such as the lipid and polymeric nanoparticles that are apt to enhance the bioavailability of the administered drugs to reach the brain. In this study, a certain number of publications were selected from different databases and literature. Meta-analysis studies using two different algorithms (DerSimonian-Laird and inverse variance) followed aiming to explore the published studies and confirm by evidence the superiority of nanocarriers in enhancing the brain bioavailability of various drugs. Furthermore, the quantitative comparison of lipid versus polymeric nanosystems was performed. Methods: The area under the curve (AUC) as an important pharmacokinetic parameter extracted from in vivo animal studies was designated as the effect in the performed meta-analysis after normalization. Forest plots were generated. Key findings and Conclusions: The meta-analysis confirmed the augmentation of the AUC after the comparison with traditional preparations such as solutions and suspensions. Most importantly, lipid nanoparticles were proven to be significantly superior to the polymeric counterparts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available