4.4 Article

The Mineralization of Various 3D-Printed PCL Composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jfb13040238

Keywords

PCL scaffolds; 3D printing; collagen coating; hydroxyapatite; alkaline phosphatase; poly-L aspartic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, different calcification methods for collagen and collagen coatings were compared for their suitability for 3D printing and production of collagen-coated scaffolds. HA directly in the collagen solution resulted in increased viscosity and led to clumping on the scaffolds. The incubation and ALP coating methods resulted in increased HA layer thickness, while no coating on the collagen layer was observed with the poly-L-aspartic acid method.
In this project, different calcification methods for collagen and collagen coatings were compared in terms of their applicability for 3D printing and production of collagen-coated scaffolds. For this purpose, scaffolds were printed from polycaprolactone PCL using the EnvisionTec 3D Bioplotter and then coated with collagen. Four different coating methods were then applied: hydroxyapatite (HA) powder directly in the collagen coating, incubation in 10x SBF, coating with alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and coating with poly-L-aspartic acid. The results were compared by ESEM, mu CT, TEM, and EDX. HA directly in the collagen solution resulted in a pH change and thus an increase in viscosity, leading to clumping on the scaffolds. As a function of incubation time in 10x SBF as well as in ALP, HA layer thickness increased, while no coating on the collagen layer was apparently observed with poly-L-aspartic acid. Only ultrathin sections and TEM with SuperEDX detected nano crystalline HA in the collagen layer. Exclusively the incubation in poly-L-aspartic acid led to HA crystals within the collagen coating compared to all other methods where the HA layers formed in different forms only at the collagen layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available