4.6 Article

Experimental study of liquid immersion cooling for different cylindrical lithium-ion batteries under rapid charging conditions

Journal

THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101569

Keywords

Lithium -ion battery; Fluorinated liquid; Immersion cooling; Fast charging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes and tests a liquid immersion cooling scheme based on SF33 for cooling different types of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) during fast charging. The results show that SF33 immersion cooling has a significant advantage in controlling battery temperature, ensuring stability and safety during fast charging. The heat transfer mechanism and bubble behavior during SF33 cooling process are analyzed.
In this study, the liquid immersion cooling scheme based on SF33 has been proposed and tested for cooling the six different types of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) under fast charging conditions. Firstly, the voltage and temperature responses of LIBs under fast charging conditions with natural convection and SF33 immersion cooling were explored. It is found that the SF33 immersion cooling has a significant advantage over natural convection on controlling the battery temperature, thus ensuring the stability and safety of LIBs in the fast charging process. Subsequently, the high-speed photography was used to observe the bubble behaviors in the cooling process of SF33, and the heat transfer mechanism in the two-phase heat transfer process corresponding to immersion cooling of LIB was preliminary analyzed and discussed. It can be concluded that when the charging current is higher, the phenomenon of subcooled boiling as well as saturation boiling is generated in the SF33. The transition from single-phase convective heat transfer to boiling heat transfer greatly increases the heat transfer coefficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available