4.6 Article

The role of jet-to-crossflow velocity ratio on convective heat transfer enhancement in the cooling of discrete heating modules

Journal

THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101549

Keywords

Jet impingement cooling; Crossflow; Discrete heating; Convective heat transfer enhancement; Thermal enhancement factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of the jet-to-cross flow velocity ratio on convective heat transfer and flow characteristics in a channel with discrete heating modules. The study reveals that as the velocity ratio increases, the jet flow becomes dominant, leading to an increase in convective heat transfer and thermal enhancement factor.
This study aims to investigate the role of jet-to-cross flow velocity ratio on convective heat transfer and flow characteristics in a channel with discrete heating modules simulating electronic components. Three-dimensional numerical simulations are performed using the finite volume method. The findings obtained for different velocity ratios of the jet-to-crossflow are compared with the reference case (crossflow solely). While keeping the crossflow velocity and the crossflow Reynolds number (Rec = 5000) constant, numerical calculations are performed for six different velocity ratios (Ur = 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0). The focus is on the role of the velocity ratio (Ur) on the mean Nusselt number (Num) on the modules' surfaces, the Nusselt number ratio (Nur), the friction coefficient ratio (fr) obtained throughout the channel and the thermal enhancement factor (TEF). As a result of the study, it is revealed that the momentum of jet flow becomes dominant over crossflow, the influence of jet flow on convective heat transfer increases, and the thermal enhancement factor increases depending on the increase in jet-to-cross flow velocity ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available