4.4 Article

Non-Similar Solutions of Dissipative Buoyancy Flow and Heat Transfer Induced by Water-Based Graphene Oxide Nanofluid through a Yawed Cylinder

Journal

LUBRICANTS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/lubricants11020060

Keywords

nanofluid; yawed cylinder; mixed convection; convective heat condition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mixed convective flow and convective heat transfer around a yawed cylinder using water-based graphene oxide nanofluid. The effects of yaw angle and nanoparticle volume fraction on flow and heat transfer were examined. The results showed that increasing yaw angle led to higher velocities and temperatures of the nanofluid, and increasing nanoparticle volume fraction enhanced shear stresses.
The fluid flow through blunt bodies that are yawed and un-yawed frequently happens in many engineering applications. The practical significance of deep-water applications such as propagation control, splitting the boundary layer over submerged blocks, and preventing recirculation bubbles is explained by the fluid flow across a yawed cylinder. The current work examined the mixed convective flow and convective heat transfer by incorporating water-based graphene oxide nanofluid around a yawed cylinder with viscous dissipation and irregular heat source/sink. To investigate the heat diffusion across the system of buoyancy effects, the mathematical formulation of the problem was modeled in terms of coupled, nonlinear partial differential equations. The boundary value problem of the fourth-order (bvp4c) solver was operated to find the non-similarity solution. The outcomes indicated that the velocity in both directions enlarged owing to the higher impacts of yaw angle for the phenomenon of assisting flow but decreased for the instance of opposing flow, while the temperature of nanofluid increased because of heightened estimations of yaw angle for both assisting and opposing flows. In addition, with larger impacts of nanoparticle volume fraction, the shear stresses were enhanced by about 0.76% and 0.93% for the case of assisting flow, while for the case of opposing flow, they improved by almost 0.65% and 1.38%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available