4.3 Review

Pleural effusion due to nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease

Journal

ERJ OPEN RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00290-2022

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although pleural effusion is common in clinical practice, it can be challenging to determine its cause, with up to 20% of cases remaining undiagnosed. Nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases can be a source of pleural effusion, which can be confirmed through patient history, physical examination, and abdominal ultrasonography. Accurate interpretation of pleural fluid from thoracentesis is crucial in this process. The diagnosis and appropriate treatment of this condition depend on the specialist's evaluation of the pleural fluid appearance and relevant tests.
Although pleural effusion is a frequent finding in clinical practice, determining its aetiology may be challenging, and up to 20% of cases remain undiagnosed. Pleural effusion may occur secondary to a nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease. A gastrointestinal origin is confirmed based on a review of the medical history of the patient, thorough physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography. In this process, it is crucial to correctly interpret findings on pleural fluid obtained by thoracentesis. In the absence of high clinical suspicion, identifying the aetiology of this type of effusion may be difficult. Clinical symptoms will be determined by the gastrointestinal process causing pleural effusion. In this setting, correct diagnosis relies on the specialist's ability to evaluate pleural fluid appearance, test for the appropriate biochemical parameters and determine whether it is necessary or not to send a specimen for culture. The established diagnosis will determine how pleural effusion is approached. Although this clinical condition is self-limited, many cases will require a multidisciplinary approach because some effusions can only be resolved with specific therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available