3.8 Article

SAMCOR: A robust and precise co-registration algorithm for brain CT and MR imaging

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101637

Keywords

CT-MRI Co -registration; Imaging Alignment; Brain imaging

Funding

  1. BRAIN Initiative [U01]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS098981]
  3. National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01 DC014589]
  4. Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS) of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston [HSC-MS-06-0385]
  5. [NIH U01 NS098981]
  6. [NIH R01 DC014589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SAMCOR approach is a novel method for co-registration of CT and MR brain imaging that addresses the inherent differences between the modalities and overcomes registration failures.
Objective: Current methods for co-registration of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) brain imaging employ optimization-based cost functions of advanced statistical metrics to align datasets (e.g. mutual information, MI). Yet the inherent differences between these modalities still lead to occasional failures of registration. To address these limitations, we developed a novel approached termed sequence adaptive multi -modal co-registration (SAMCOR), which is robust to intensity, feature, and scanner-based differences.Methods: SAMCOR was validated using 152 CT and MRI datasets from subjects implanted with intracranial electrodes for evaluation of medically-refractory epilepsy. Alignment outcomes were compared against five current open-source co-registration algorithms and a widely used commercial neurosurgical navigation system and classified as aligned/not-aligned relative to manually co-registered datasets.Results: SAMCOR was the only method to align all 152 datasets (100%), while success rates for existing algo-rithms ranged from 3% to 82%. Given the time-intensive nature of manual verification, we further developed a metric to automatically quantify co-registration accuracy using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). We applied a binary classification analysis to evaluate this DSC metric performance against traditional mutual information (MI) metrics for predicting alignment outcomes. The DSC metric demonstrated significantly higher positive and negative predictive values (0.93 and 0.97, respectively) than MI (0.79 and 0.87, respectively). The DSC classifier accuracy was 94.7% (vs 83.2% for MI).Conclusions: Our novel approaches for CT-MRI co-registration and quantitative alignment outcome analysis demonstrate significant advancements of the state-of-the-art for intermodal image co-registration with clinical relevance in patients with implanted intracranial devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available