4.1 Article

Predicting Dissolution Kinetics of Tricalcium Silicate Using Deep Learning and Analytical Models

Journal

ALGORITHMS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/a16010007

Keywords

tricalcium silicate; analytical model; ion activity; dissolution kinetics; deep forest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dissolution kinetics of tricalcium silicate (C3S) in undersaturated solvents can be accurately predicted using the deep forest (DF) model, which takes into account various variables such as measurement method, temperature, and physicochemical properties of solvents.
The dissolution kinetics of Portland cement is a critical factor in controlling the hydration reaction and improving the performance of concrete. Tricalcium silicate (C3S), the primary phase in Portland cement, is known to have complex dissolution mechanisms that involve multiple reactions and changes to particle surfaces. As a result, current analytical models are unable to accurately predict the dissolution kinetics of C3S in various solvents when it is undersaturated with respect to the solvent. This paper employs the deep forest (DF) model to predict the dissolution rate of C3S in the undersaturated solvent. The DF model takes into account several variables, including the measurement method (i.e., reactor connected to inductive coupled plasma spectrometer and flow chamber with vertical scanning interferometry), temperature, and physicochemical properties of solvents. Next, the DF model evaluates the influence of each variable on the dissolution rate of C3S, and this information is used to develop a closed-form analytical model that can predict the dissolution rate of C3S. The coefficients and constant of the analytical model are optimized in two scenarios: generic and alkaline solvents. The results show that both the DF and analytical models are able to produce reliable predictions of the dissolution rate of C3S when it is undersaturated and far from equilibrium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available