3.8 Article

Positive feedback, quenching, and sequential super star cluster (SSC) formation in NGC 4945

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 519, Issue 1, Pages L68-L73

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac154

Keywords

stars: formation; ISM: jets and outflows; ISM: molecules; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: starburst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ALMA imaging was used to observe HCN and HC3N in the nucleus of NGC 4945, tracing the protostellar phase in super star clusters. Out of the identified SSCs, eight were found to be in the proto-SSC phase, showing vibrational HCN and HC3N emission. The ages of the proto-SSCs were estimated to be 5-9.7 x10(4) years, with the more evolved ones close to reaching the zero-age main sequence.
We have used ALMA imaging (resolutions 0.1-0.4 arcsec) of ground and vibrationally excited lines of HCN and HC3N toward the nucleus of NGC 4945 to trace the protostellar phase in super star clusters (proto-SSC). Out of the 14 identified SSCs, we find that eight are in the proto-SSC phase showing vibrational HCN emission with five of them also showing vibrational HC3N emission. We estimate proto-SSC ages of 5-9.7 x10(4) yr. The more evolved ones, with only HCN emission, are close to reach the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS; ages similar to 10(5) yr). The excitation of the parental cloud seems to be related to the SSC evolutionary stage, with high (similar to 65 K) and low (similar to 25 K) rotational temperatures for the youngest proto and ZAMS SSCs, respectively. Heating by the H II regions in the SSC ZAMS phase seems to be rather local. The youngest proto-SSCs are located at the edges of the molecular outflow, indicating SSC formation by positive feedback in the shocked regions. The proto-SSCs in NGC 4945 seem to be more evolved than in the starburst galaxy NGC 253. We propose that sequential SSC formation can explain the spatial distribution and different ages of the SSCs in both galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available