4.5 Article

Expression of Peroxiredoxin 1 After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1217-1226

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-015-0214-6

Keywords

Spinal cord injury (SCI); Peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1); Glial cell proliferation; Rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive astrogliosis and microgliosis after spinal cord injury (SCI) contribute to glial scar formation that impedes axonal regeneration. The mechanisms underlying reactive astrocyte and microglia proliferation upon injury remain partially understood. Peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) is an antioxidant participating in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. However, PRDX1 functions in SCI-induced astrocyte and microglia proliferation are unknown. In this study, we established an acute spinal cord contusion injury model in adult rats to investigate the potential role of PRDX1 during the pathological process of SCI. We found the palpable expression increase of PRDX1 after SCI by western blot and immunohistochemistry staining. Double immunofluorescence staining showed that PRDX1 expression mainly increased in astrocytes and microglia. In addition, PRDX1/proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) colocalized in astrocytes and microglia. Furthermore, PCNA expression also elevated after SCI, as well as was positively correlated with PRDX1 expression. In vitro, PRDX1 expression in primary rat spinal cord astrocytes and microglia changed in a concentration- and time-dependent manner according to LPS treatment. In addition, PRDX1 knockdown in astrocytes and microglia resulted in the decrease of PCNA expression after LPS stimulation, showing that PRDX1 promoted astrocyte and microglia proliferation after inflammation. Our results suggested that PRDX1 might play a crucial role in astrocyte and microglia proliferation after SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available