3.8 Article

PMS2 Pathogenic Variant in Lynch Syndrome- Associated Colorectal Cancer with Polyps

Journal

GLOBAL MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 1-5

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759888

Keywords

lynch syndrome; PMS2 deficiency; mismatch repair gene; colorectal cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the genetic etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a patient with multiple colorectal polyps and a family history of cancers. A deleterious PMS2 germline heterozygous mutation was detected, supporting the association between Lynch syndrome and polyps, and demonstrating the predisposition of PMS2 heterozygous mutation in Lynch-associated CRC at a young age.
Background Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition due to the germline mutation in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes including MLH1 , MSH2 , MSH6, and PMS2 (post-meiotic segregation increased 2). The MMR mutation carriers have high risk for cancers. Pathogenic PMS2 variants are rarely reported in LS-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) with colorectal polyps. The aim of the study was to investigate the genetic etiology of CRC in an individual with CRC with multiple colorectal polyps and a family history of cancers.Patients and Methods The index patient was an African male affected by CRC with multiple colorectal polyps. The clinical diagnostic for LS was based on the Amsterdam II criteria and pedigree. Next-generation sequencing with inherited cancer genes panel was used to detect the pathogenic variant.Results The patient fulfilled the Amsterdam II criteria and the pedigree revealed a family history of recurrent CRC. A deleterious PMS2 germline heterozygous mutation c.2192_2196delTAACT was detected.Conclusion Our study supports the notion that LS may be associated with polyps and shows the predisposition of PMS2 heterozygous mutation in LS-associated CRC at young age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available