4.0 Article

Promoters vs. telomeres: AP-endonuclease 1 interactions with abasic sites in G-quadruplex folds depend on topology

Journal

RSC CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 261-270

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cb00233g

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the topological properties of AP-bearing G4 folds and their impact on APE1 interaction. The results showed that APE1 preferentially binds to telomere sequences with hybrid or basket folds, while the binding to promoter G4s is weaker. These findings suggest that the topological features of G4s in gene promoters are critical for APE1 recognition and gene regulation.
The DNA repair endonuclease APE1 is responsible for the cleavage of abasic sites (AP) in DNA as well as binding AP in promoter G-quadruplex (G4) folds in some genes to regulate transcription. The present studies focused on the topological properties of AP-bearing G4 folds and how they impact APE1 interaction. The human telomere sequence with a tetrahydrofuran model (F) of an AP was folded in K+- or Na+-containing buffers to adopt hybrid- or basket-folds, respectively. Endonuclease and binding assays were performed with APE1 and the G4 substrates, and the data were compared to prior work with parallel-stranded VEGF and NEIL3 promoter G4s to identify topological differences. The APE1-catalyzed endonuclease assays led to the conclusion that telomere G4 folds were slightly better substrates than the promoter G4s, but the yields were all low compared to duplex DNA. In the binding assays, G4 topological differences were observed in which APE1 bound telomere G4s with dissociation constants similar to single-stranded DNA, and promoter G4s were bound with nearly ten-fold lower values similar to duplex DNA. An in-cellulo assay with the telomere G4 in a model promoter bearing a lesion failed to regulate transcription. These data support a hypothesis that G4 topology in gene promoters is a critical feature that APE1 recognizes for gene regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available