4.5 Article

Development of robust model to estimate gas-oil interfacial tension using least square support vector machine: Experimental and modeling study

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 122-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.08.012

Keywords

Interfacial tension; Viscosity; Gas; Oil; Predictive modeling; Least-squares support vector machine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measuring of physical properties in laboratory is very important issue in petroleum industry. Secondary and tertiary oil recovery, gas condensate recovery, especially by gas injection, near-critical fluids recovery and wettability alteration surface tensions are very important to measure. One objective of this study is to perform a precise measuring procedure employing the pendant drop technique. Iranian oil reservoir samples as denser phase and its immiscible injecting gas are used at reservoir condition. While experimental measurements are often expensive and time-consuming, models are commonly used. Moreover, this study presents the potential of the least squares support vector machines (LSSVM) modeling approach to predict the gas-oil interfacial tension. To develop the model, a total of 75 data generated from our experiments covering a wide temperature range of 100 through 200 F and a wide pressure range of 14.7 through 5000 psi are used. Genetic algorithm (GA) as population based stochastic search algorithm was used to gain the optimal LSSVM models parameters respectively. The results revealed that the GA-LSSVM are capable of capturing the complicated nonlinear relationship between the input and output variables. For the purpose of predicting gas-oil interfacial tension, the GA-LSSVM models yielded the mean absolute error (MAE) and coefficient of determination (R-2) values of 1.6028 and 0.9988, respectively for the whole data set. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available