3.8 Article

RUSSIAN ACTIONISM AS BIOPOLITICAL PERFORMANCE: SHIFTING GROUNDS AND FORMS OF RESISTANCE

Journal

RUSSIAN LITERATURE
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 111-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.11.001

Keywords

Biopolitics; Biopower; Performance; Actionism; Post-Soviet; Pavlensky; Pussy; Riot; Voina; Nenasheva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article traces the development of Russian actionism through a biopolitical lens, exploring how it has evolved from a public enactment of post-Soviet society's regression to a more consciously biopolitical resistance against Vladimir Putin's rule. The author analyzes the actions and statements of Voina, Pussy Riot, Pyotr Pavlensky, and Katrin Nenasheva, identifying four main tactics of resistance that have shifted actionism towards practices of radical care. The article also briefly touches on actions performed after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
This article traces the development of Russian actionism through a biopolitical lens. Emerging in the 1990s as a public enactment of post-Soviet society's regression from bios to zoe, actionism became more consciously biopolitical in the twenty-first century as a succession of artists sought to challenge the biopoliticization of life under Vladimir Putin. Focusing on the actions and statements of Voina, Pussy Riot, Pyotr Pavlensky, and Katrin Nenasheva, the author identifies four main tactics of resistance, gradually leading actionism away from its roots in aestheticized violence toward the cultivation of practices of radical care. The article concludes with a brief overview of actions performed in the wake of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available