Journal
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 111-142Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.11.001
Keywords
Biopolitics; Biopower; Performance; Actionism; Post-Soviet; Pavlensky; Pussy; Riot; Voina; Nenasheva
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article traces the development of Russian actionism through a biopolitical lens, exploring how it has evolved from a public enactment of post-Soviet society's regression to a more consciously biopolitical resistance against Vladimir Putin's rule. The author analyzes the actions and statements of Voina, Pussy Riot, Pyotr Pavlensky, and Katrin Nenasheva, identifying four main tactics of resistance that have shifted actionism towards practices of radical care. The article also briefly touches on actions performed after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
This article traces the development of Russian actionism through a biopolitical lens. Emerging in the 1990s as a public enactment of post-Soviet society's regression from bios to zoe, actionism became more consciously biopolitical in the twenty-first century as a succession of artists sought to challenge the biopoliticization of life under Vladimir Putin. Focusing on the actions and statements of Voina, Pussy Riot, Pyotr Pavlensky, and Katrin Nenasheva, the author identifies four main tactics of resistance, gradually leading actionism away from its roots in aestheticized violence toward the cultivation of practices of radical care. The article concludes with a brief overview of actions performed in the wake of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available