3.8 Article

THE EROTIC OF SELF-HARM(S): A CATASTROPHIC BODY IN DANIIL KHARMS AND YAKOV DRUSKIN

Journal

RUSSIAN LITERATURE
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 35-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.11.007

Keywords

Kharms; Druskin; Biopolitics; Masculinity; Sexuality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the biopolitics of writing and the construction of a catastrophic writing body in the notebooks of Daniil Kharms and the essays by Yakov Druskin. Personal writings are seen as self-harming texts and a form of freedom in situations where resistance is unavailable.
This article addresses the biopolitics of writing and the construction of the writing body as catastrophic in the notebooks of Daniil Kharms (1905-1942) and the essays by his friend philosopher Yakov Druskin (1902-1980) from the late 1920s and 1930s. I aim to show how their personal writings work as an auto-aggressive text, an act of textual self-harm and a form of freedom in a situation where resistance is felt to be unavailable. The close reading focuses on the two tendencies in which the biological comes to be understood as political: the articulation of a social/political difference as physiological, and the centrality of sexuality to a project of self-knowledge that diary-writing offers. Narrating social exclusion in the language of ailments, this writ-ing appears almost literally biopolitical: biologising political difference and inviting a political reading of the origins of the illness. By tracing these instances, the article shows how the failing body becomes a language in which the sense of alienation and fear can be expressed, and spiritual insights experienced. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available