3.8 Article

Inverted T-shape free gingival graft for treatment of RT3 gingival recession defects: Reporting of two cases

Journal

CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 67-71

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cap.10231

Keywords

gingival recession; gingival diseases; periodontal disease; humans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a novel surgical technique for reconstruction of lost interdental papilla in RT3 recessions. The use of an inverted T-shaped graft can improve the results and increase the keratinized tissue width.
IntroductionOne of the most challenging aspects of treating gingival recession type 3 (RT3) is reconstructing lost interdental papillae, which is directly related to the loss of interproximal bone. Free gingival graft (FGG) has been successfully used to increase the keratinized tissue width (KTW) with minimal trauma to the interdental papilla. This presented case suggests that FGG can be used for reconstruction of lost initerdental papilla creeping attachment also plays an additional role in improving the results. Case PresentationThe included two case reports suggest a novel technique using an FGG that is shaped in an inverted T-shape to achieve partial root coverage, improve the compromised interdental papilla, and increase the KTW in RT3 defects. ConclusionsThis report presents a novel yet intuitive surgical technique for partial coverage of RT3 defects and reconstruction of the interdental papilla. The inverted T-shape soft tissue graft may be a valuable technique for papillary reconstruction in the challenge of RT3 recessions. Key pointsWhy is this case new information? Reporting innovative technique with the interproximal extension of the FGG that sutured lingually with the lingual marginal gingiva.Improve interdental clinical attachment phenotype and height.More predictable root coverage because of increased vascularized interproximal bed for the graft to be survived.What are the keys to the successful management of this case? Having at least 2mm interproximal space for graft survival.Good Extension with proper fixation of the lingual part of the graft, and stabilization of the graft.What are the primary limitations to success in this case? limited capacity for perfusion and survival of the lingual extension due to limited vascularity.More investigations are necessary to confirm the validity of this technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available