Controversies in spine research: Organ culture versus in vivo models for studies of the intervertebral disc

Intervertebral disc degeneration is a common cause of low back pain, the leading cause of disability worldwide. Appropriate preclinical models for intervertebral disc research are essential to achieving a better understanding of underlying pathophysiology and for the development, evaluation, and translation of more effective treatments. To this end, in vivo animal and ex vivo organ culture models are both widely used by spine researchers; however, the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches are a source of ongoing controversy. In this article, members from the Spine and Preclinical Models Sections of the Orthopedic Research Society, including experts in both basic and translational spine research, present contrasting arguments in support of in vivo animal models versus ex vivo organ culture models for studies of the disc, supported by a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. The objective is to provide a deeper understanding of the respective advantages and limitations of these approaches, and advance the field toward a consensus with respect to appropriate model selection and implementation. We conclude that complementary use of several model types and leveraging the unique advantages of each is likely to result in the highest impact research in most instances.

Automated summary

Intervertebral disc degeneration is a common cause of low back pain, and appropriate preclinical models are crucial for research and treatment development. This article presents contrasting arguments for in vivo animal models and ex vivo organ culture models for disc studies, aiming to reach a consensus on model selection and implementation. The authors conclude that combining multiple model types and leveraging their unique advantages can lead to high-impact research in most cases.